Sorry not to have posted for a while – I’ve been very busy at work and have had no time or energy for blogging, sadly. However, I have seen a few costume dramas in the last few weeks, so thought I’d try to do one or two reviews before they completely fade in my mind.

The Trench was one historical film I missed at the cinema, but have now finally managed to see on TV. I was especially interested to see it because it is set in the First World War – and I’ve been noticing lately that there seem to be surprisingly few films and dramas set during that conflict compared to the huge number dealing with the Second World War. I suppose this is because the two wars were so close together, and the relatively brief period in between included only a few years of talkies.
The film was both written and directed by author William Boyd – I’ve only read one of his novels, which, as far as I remember, I didn’t like very much, but this film impressed me and now I’d like to give him another try. It was made on a low budget, feeling like a TV movie, but I felt this is something which works well, as the limited sets add to the sense of suffocating claustropobia and boredom.
As with a number of older war films I’ve seen recently, this drama has an all-male cast – although the men do spend a lot of time talking about their wives and sweethearts. At the time the movie was made, its cast were mainly unknowns. That has all changed since – Danny Dyer, Julian Rhind-Tutt and James D’Arcy are all well-known names, while Daniel Craig, who plays Sgt Winter, and Cillian Murphy, seen here in a small but memorable role, have both become stars, and Ben Whishaw, cast as Keats in forthcoming movie Bright Star, is firmly on the road to stardom.
Paul Nicholls, who was well-known at the time from his stint in top UK soap EastEnders, plays the lead role, as teenage Private Billy MacFarlane, who joins up to follow in the footsteps of his older brother, Eddie. His performance feels a little understated and unsure compared to some of the slightly older actors – but I’d say that doesn’t really hurt the film, since, after all, his character is supposed to be young and uncertain.

Paul Nicholls as Billy
Daniel Craig, by contrast, dominates every scene he appears in, with an intense presence which overshadows anyone else in sight. The scene which will probably stick in my mind most from this movie is one where he is eating a jar of strawberry jam made by his wife, and tries to share some with young Billy, who repeatedly refuses because he doesn’t like jam and doesn’t want to get the seeds between his teeth. Craig stays very quiet, but the expression of bewilderment and loneliness in his eyes, as his efforts at kindness are politely rebuffed, says a lot.
For most of the film, the very young men are cooped up together in the trench, waiting for something to happen, and increasingly getting irritated with one another over minor things.There’s a huge and pointless row over who stole a “naughty” postcard from a collection hoarded by one unpopular boy, who flies into an almost murderous rage over the affair. The atmosphere feels almost like my memories of boarding school, but of course with the difference that these boys won’t be going home soon, or in many cases at all.

Daniel Craig and Paul Nicholls
Adding to the mix of emotions is a strong element of class conflict, with the officers being shown as isolated and insistent on their status. Julian Rhind-Tutt is good as the despairing Second Lieutenant Ellis Harte, who seems to long for the friendship of his sergeant but to be held back by a feeling that, after all, he’s not quite one of us. And Adrian Lukis, who was so good as Wickham in the 1995 Pride and Prejudice, has a very small but chilling role as a Colonel who is keen to use the men as extras in a newsreel, but couldn’t give a damn about any of them as individuals.
If I have one criticism, it is that it is a pity that everything seems so clean and gleaming. Surely there would have been more dirt and shabbiness among soldiers crouched in a trench on the Western Front. There is one scene with a single rat dashing through the trench, but in reality there were loads of them. I also think it unlikely that the soldier who is ridiculed for being fat would have been able to maintain his ample weight on such pitiful rations.
However, despite these minor problems, my feeling is that this is a film which deserves to be better known. And, as its cast become ever more famous, maybe it will be.

A French poster for the movie
It’s good to see you blogging again and I want to thank you for commenting on my blog on film studies on Austen. Of all the books I mentioned, really the two on _S&S_ itself (Ruoff and Armstrong) are the best and they are slender books, surely not that expensive. Of the film studies, the best off hand are _Jane Austen on Screen_, edd Macdonalds and _The Cinematic Austen_.
Getting to yours, I agree WW1 is not depicted as much as it ought to be. There _Upstairs Downstairs_ may be commended, but if you recall James commits suicide at the end. I wonder if WW1 is too controversial nowadays: it is no longer thought at all to have had any decent cause or result, and so many were slaughtered. It can also be called the beginning of our modern world and that’s troubling too.
What I notice is lately some movies said to be about WW2 are nonetheless depicted in moods and clothing that recall WW1. _Atonement_ is such a movie.
I agree this cast is one that would nowadays be thought stellar. Interesting a couple of them ended up in Austen and older high status books film adaptations. When was it made, as only recently have the TV and cinema movies really been stopping making the actors and scenes superclean and polished and showing the filth and realities of skin and clothes of our living world.
Ellen
Hello Ellen, thank you for commenting and for the details about the Austen books. I do hope to do a bit more blogging as work allows.:)
I must admit I never saw very much of ‘Upstairs Downstairs’ – it’s yet another series I would like to watch properly some time, though. I agree it’s possible the First World War is too controversial – maybe also that when people want to make a film about a war then WW2 is that much more recent. I did think ‘A Very Long Engagement’ was a good film about WWI – I remember you liked that one too – and also I would like to see all of ‘Testament of Youth’ if it is ever released on DVD or repeated. So many mini-series and films which are worth re-watching!
‘The Trench’ was made in 1999, so I think there had already been some mini-series which did show the dirt and darkness of reality, but this one didn’t really – though I still liked it.
Just to let you know I did receive the comment. Also I am wondering what you thought of Sue Harper’s book. When you finish, I’d love to know. You could post — or write a blog — or just email me.
Ellen
When I was younger, (late 70s early 80s) there were several very good productions set during ww1, most notably “Testament of Youth” starring Cheryl Campbell. Duchess of Duke Street had some memorable ww1 episodes and there was the action series Wings about the Royal Flying Corp. All three were favourites of mine.
Janette
Thanks for these recommendations, Janette. I really want to see ‘Testament of Youth’ in particular – hoping it might eventually be released on DVD.